Review



integrin α v β 3  (Bioss)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bioss is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bioss manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Bioss integrin α v β 3
    Integrin α V β 3, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 54 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/integrin α v β 3/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 54 article reviews
    integrin α v β 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Bioss integrin α v β 3
    Integrin α V β 3, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/integrin α v β 3/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    integrin α v β 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin
    Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the <t>α</t> <t>ν</t> β 3 <t>integrin</t> on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs
    Mouse Polyclonal α ν β 3 Integrin, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore anti-integrin α v β 3
    The AS0326 antibody blocks MFAP4s interaction with endothelial integrins (A) HPMECs were subjected to MFAP4-mediated adhesion, and inhibition of adhesion was tested with integrin α V β 3 - or integrin α V β 5 -blocking antibodies. (B) mAS0326 antibody (mAS) blocks HPMEC adhesion to MFAP4. MFI is of fluorescently labeled cells. IC, isotype control. Significance is calculated relative to the MFAP4-treated positive control in (A) and (B). Flow cytometry staining of (C) integrin α V β 3 and (D) integrin α V β 5 in HPMEC compared to IC. Representative histograms of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. Human primary retinal endothelial cells (RECs) were seeded on immobilized albumin or MFAP4. RECs were stimulated with VEGF and 24-h proliferation was assessed. (E) REC proliferation was co-treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or <t>hAS0326</t> (hAS). REC migration for 3.5 h on MFAP4-coated surface was assessed by Transwell assay using VEGF as chemoattractant. (F) MFAP4-dependent migration was treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326. Data are shown as individual datapoints with mean (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are normalized to albumin control. Significance is calculated relative to the hAS0326 treatment group for (E) and (F). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Representative images of REC’s (purple) migrated through the pores of the Transwell assay inserts when migration on (G) albumin-coated insert or (H) MFAP4-coated insert. Bar, 100 μm. All antibodies were provided in 10 μg/mL doses for (A), (B), (E), and (F).
    Anti Integrin α V β 3, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-integrin α v β 3/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-integrin α v β 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore mouse anti-human α v β 3 integrin antibody clone lm609
    The AS0326 antibody blocks MFAP4s interaction with endothelial integrins (A) HPMECs were subjected to MFAP4-mediated adhesion, and inhibition of adhesion was tested with integrin α V β 3 - or integrin α V β 5 -blocking antibodies. (B) mAS0326 antibody (mAS) blocks HPMEC adhesion to MFAP4. MFI is of fluorescently labeled cells. IC, isotype control. Significance is calculated relative to the MFAP4-treated positive control in (A) and (B). Flow cytometry staining of (C) integrin α V β 3 and (D) integrin α V β 5 in HPMEC compared to IC. Representative histograms of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. Human primary retinal endothelial cells (RECs) were seeded on immobilized albumin or MFAP4. RECs were stimulated with VEGF and 24-h proliferation was assessed. (E) REC proliferation was co-treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or <t>hAS0326</t> (hAS). REC migration for 3.5 h on MFAP4-coated surface was assessed by Transwell assay using VEGF as chemoattractant. (F) MFAP4-dependent migration was treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326. Data are shown as individual datapoints with mean (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are normalized to albumin control. Significance is calculated relative to the hAS0326 treatment group for (E) and (F). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Representative images of REC’s (purple) migrated through the pores of the Transwell assay inserts when migration on (G) albumin-coated insert or (H) MFAP4-coated insert. Bar, 100 μm. All antibodies were provided in 10 μg/mL doses for (A), (B), (E), and (F).
    Mouse Anti Human α V β 3 Integrin Antibody Clone Lm609, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-human α v β 3 integrin antibody clone lm609/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human α v β 3 integrin antibody clone lm609 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bioss anti integrin α v β 3
    The AS0326 antibody blocks MFAP4s interaction with endothelial integrins (A) HPMECs were subjected to MFAP4-mediated adhesion, and inhibition of adhesion was tested with integrin α V β 3 - or integrin α V β 5 -blocking antibodies. (B) mAS0326 antibody (mAS) blocks HPMEC adhesion to MFAP4. MFI is of fluorescently labeled cells. IC, isotype control. Significance is calculated relative to the MFAP4-treated positive control in (A) and (B). Flow cytometry staining of (C) integrin α V β 3 and (D) integrin α V β 5 in HPMEC compared to IC. Representative histograms of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. Human primary retinal endothelial cells (RECs) were seeded on immobilized albumin or MFAP4. RECs were stimulated with VEGF and 24-h proliferation was assessed. (E) REC proliferation was co-treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or <t>hAS0326</t> (hAS). REC migration for 3.5 h on MFAP4-coated surface was assessed by Transwell assay using VEGF as chemoattractant. (F) MFAP4-dependent migration was treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326. Data are shown as individual datapoints with mean (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are normalized to albumin control. Significance is calculated relative to the hAS0326 treatment group for (E) and (F). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Representative images of REC’s (purple) migrated through the pores of the Transwell assay inserts when migration on (G) albumin-coated insert or (H) MFAP4-coated insert. Bar, 100 μm. All antibodies were provided in 10 μg/mL doses for (A), (B), (E), and (F).
    Anti Integrin α V β 3, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti integrin α v β 3/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti integrin α v β 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore phycoerythrin (pe)-conjugated mouse anti-integrin α v β 3 antibody (clone lm609)
    The AS0326 antibody blocks MFAP4s interaction with endothelial integrins (A) HPMECs were subjected to MFAP4-mediated adhesion, and inhibition of adhesion was tested with integrin α V β 3 - or integrin α V β 5 -blocking antibodies. (B) mAS0326 antibody (mAS) blocks HPMEC adhesion to MFAP4. MFI is of fluorescently labeled cells. IC, isotype control. Significance is calculated relative to the MFAP4-treated positive control in (A) and (B). Flow cytometry staining of (C) integrin α V β 3 and (D) integrin α V β 5 in HPMEC compared to IC. Representative histograms of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. Human primary retinal endothelial cells (RECs) were seeded on immobilized albumin or MFAP4. RECs were stimulated with VEGF and 24-h proliferation was assessed. (E) REC proliferation was co-treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or <t>hAS0326</t> (hAS). REC migration for 3.5 h on MFAP4-coated surface was assessed by Transwell assay using VEGF as chemoattractant. (F) MFAP4-dependent migration was treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326. Data are shown as individual datapoints with mean (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are normalized to albumin control. Significance is calculated relative to the hAS0326 treatment group for (E) and (F). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Representative images of REC’s (purple) migrated through the pores of the Transwell assay inserts when migration on (G) albumin-coated insert or (H) MFAP4-coated insert. Bar, 100 μm. All antibodies were provided in 10 μg/mL doses for (A), (B), (E), and (F).
    Phycoerythrin (Pe) Conjugated Mouse Anti Integrin α V β 3 Antibody (Clone Lm609), supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/phycoerythrin (pe)-conjugated mouse anti-integrin α v β 3 antibody (clone lm609)/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    phycoerythrin (pe)-conjugated mouse anti-integrin α v β 3 antibody (clone lm609) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher rabbit anti-α v β 3 integrin antibody
    In vitro binding of cRGD-MB to HUVEC under flow conditions. A Fluorescence images of non-stimulated (control) or TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and α v β 3 integrins were stained with DAPI (blue), wheat germ agglutinin-488 (WGA, green) and CD51/61 antibody (red), respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Quantitative analysis indicating significantly higher area fraction of α v β 3 <t>integrin</t> in HUVEC stimulated with TNF-α. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C Schematic showing the in vitro setup of the flow chamber. Petri dishes with cultured HUVEC were connected to a flow chamber, in turn perfused with an MB solution (standard-MB, cRAD-MB, or cRGD-MB) at 0.25 mL/min. D Representative fluorescent images of the three different, rhodamine-labeled MB types binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and MB were labeled with DAPI (blue), WGA (green) and rhodamine (red), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm. E Number of bound MB per cell. cRGD-MB displayed significantly higher binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC compared to both controls. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent MB batches. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired t-tests in panel B, while for panel E comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001
    Rabbit Anti α V β 3 Integrin Antibody, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-α v β 3 integrin antibody/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti-α v β 3 integrin antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse anti α v β 3 integrin phycoerythrin
    In vitro binding of cRGD-MB to HUVEC under flow conditions. A Fluorescence images of non-stimulated (control) or TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and α v β 3 integrins were stained with DAPI (blue), wheat germ agglutinin-488 (WGA, green) and CD51/61 antibody (red), respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Quantitative analysis indicating significantly higher area fraction of α v β 3 <t>integrin</t> in HUVEC stimulated with TNF-α. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C Schematic showing the in vitro setup of the flow chamber. Petri dishes with cultured HUVEC were connected to a flow chamber, in turn perfused with an MB solution (standard-MB, cRAD-MB, or cRGD-MB) at 0.25 mL/min. D Representative fluorescent images of the three different, rhodamine-labeled MB types binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and MB were labeled with DAPI (blue), WGA (green) and rhodamine (red), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm. E Number of bound MB per cell. cRGD-MB displayed significantly higher binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC compared to both controls. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent MB batches. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired t-tests in panel B, while for panel E comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001
    Mouse Anti α V β 3 Integrin Phycoerythrin, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti α v β 3 integrin phycoerythrin/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti α v β 3 integrin phycoerythrin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti α v β 3 antibody
    In vitro binding of cRGD-MB to HUVEC under flow conditions. A Fluorescence images of non-stimulated (control) or TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and α v β 3 integrins were stained with DAPI (blue), wheat germ agglutinin-488 (WGA, green) and CD51/61 antibody (red), respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Quantitative analysis indicating significantly higher area fraction of α v β 3 <t>integrin</t> in HUVEC stimulated with TNF-α. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C Schematic showing the in vitro setup of the flow chamber. Petri dishes with cultured HUVEC were connected to a flow chamber, in turn perfused with an MB solution (standard-MB, cRAD-MB, or cRGD-MB) at 0.25 mL/min. D Representative fluorescent images of the three different, rhodamine-labeled MB types binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and MB were labeled with DAPI (blue), WGA (green) and rhodamine (red), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm. E Number of bound MB per cell. cRGD-MB displayed significantly higher binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC compared to both controls. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent MB batches. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired t-tests in panel B, while for panel E comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001
    Anti α V β 3 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti α v β 3 antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti α v β 3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bioss integrins α ν β 3
    Adenovirus binding affinity to MPNST cell lines and viral receptor expression (A) Schematic of viral genome for Ad vectors used in binding assay. (B) Each cell line was infected with Ad vectors equipped with either WT (Ad5), RGD fiber-modified (RGD), or chimeric Ad5/Ad3 fiber (Ad5/3) at 100 VP/cell. Binding was allowed to proceed for 2 h at 4°C, then was assessed by qPCR. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of CAR and integrin expression. MPNST cell lines were incubated with fluorescent antibodies against α V β 3 and α V β 5 <t>integrins</t> and coxsackie adenovirus receptor (CAR). The data are shown as a relative percentage of positive cells scored among at least 10,000 cells assessed. (D) Flow cytometry plots by cell line with respective isotype control for viral entry receptors in MPNST cell lines and iHSC1 λ controls. Error bars represents ± standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Student's t test.
    Integrins α ν β 3, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/integrins α ν β 3/product/Bioss
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    integrins α ν β 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the α ν β 3 integrin on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs

    Journal: Molecular Imaging and Biology

    Article Title: Quantifying Molecular Changes in the Preeclamptic Rat Placenta with Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

    doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-01988-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Quantification methods for binding contrast agent.​ a LE method: Acoustic intensity at t = t Burst – 40 s represents attached contrast agent value. b dTE method: Schematic showing changes before (t ≈ 2 min) and after Burst (t = t Burst + 30 s). The schematic illustrates the dTE method to quantify the attached contrast agent within the placenta. After tail vein injection, MBs adhere to the α ν β 3 integrin on the endothelial cells. Ten minutes later, a destructive ultrasound pulse is applied to destroy the adherent MBs, and 1 min later, the free-circulating MBs are replenished. c BCM method: data from t = 0 ~ 2 min are fitted into the complete equation for each pixel to calculate the binding constant of the attached MBs

    Article Snippet: Placental sections were incubated with mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin (1:200 dilution, Bioss antibodies, bs‐1310R) and secondary HRP-polymer (Rabbit-On-Rodent HRP-polymer, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Injection

    α ν β 3 integrin expression in NP vs RUPP placentas. a IHC staining in NP placenta. b IHC staining in RUPP placenta, showing decreased intensity. c Quantification of α ν β 3 integrin protein expression. Each data point represents the mean of 3–4 slices from a single placenta from each rat subject. ( n = 4 rats; mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05). d Relative α ν β 3 mRNA levels ( n = 6 each; normalized to β-Actin; mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01)

    Journal: Molecular Imaging and Biology

    Article Title: Quantifying Molecular Changes in the Preeclamptic Rat Placenta with Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

    doi: 10.1007/s11307-025-01988-4

    Figure Lengend Snippet: α ν β 3 integrin expression in NP vs RUPP placentas. a IHC staining in NP placenta. b IHC staining in RUPP placenta, showing decreased intensity. c Quantification of α ν β 3 integrin protein expression. Each data point represents the mean of 3–4 slices from a single placenta from each rat subject. ( n = 4 rats; mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05). d Relative α ν β 3 mRNA levels ( n = 6 each; normalized to β-Actin; mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01)

    Article Snippet: Placental sections were incubated with mouse polyclonal α ν β 3 integrin (1:200 dilution, Bioss antibodies, bs‐1310R) and secondary HRP-polymer (Rabbit-On-Rodent HRP-polymer, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry

    The AS0326 antibody blocks MFAP4s interaction with endothelial integrins (A) HPMECs were subjected to MFAP4-mediated adhesion, and inhibition of adhesion was tested with integrin α V β 3 - or integrin α V β 5 -blocking antibodies. (B) mAS0326 antibody (mAS) blocks HPMEC adhesion to MFAP4. MFI is of fluorescently labeled cells. IC, isotype control. Significance is calculated relative to the MFAP4-treated positive control in (A) and (B). Flow cytometry staining of (C) integrin α V β 3 and (D) integrin α V β 5 in HPMEC compared to IC. Representative histograms of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. Human primary retinal endothelial cells (RECs) were seeded on immobilized albumin or MFAP4. RECs were stimulated with VEGF and 24-h proliferation was assessed. (E) REC proliferation was co-treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326 (hAS). REC migration for 3.5 h on MFAP4-coated surface was assessed by Transwell assay using VEGF as chemoattractant. (F) MFAP4-dependent migration was treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326. Data are shown as individual datapoints with mean (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are normalized to albumin control. Significance is calculated relative to the hAS0326 treatment group for (E) and (F). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Representative images of REC’s (purple) migrated through the pores of the Transwell assay inserts when migration on (G) albumin-coated insert or (H) MFAP4-coated insert. Bar, 100 μm. All antibodies were provided in 10 μg/mL doses for (A), (B), (E), and (F).

    Journal: Molecular Therapy

    Article Title: Pharmacological blocking of microfibrillar-associated protein 4 reduces retinal neoangiogenesis and vascular leakage

    doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.038

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The AS0326 antibody blocks MFAP4s interaction with endothelial integrins (A) HPMECs were subjected to MFAP4-mediated adhesion, and inhibition of adhesion was tested with integrin α V β 3 - or integrin α V β 5 -blocking antibodies. (B) mAS0326 antibody (mAS) blocks HPMEC adhesion to MFAP4. MFI is of fluorescently labeled cells. IC, isotype control. Significance is calculated relative to the MFAP4-treated positive control in (A) and (B). Flow cytometry staining of (C) integrin α V β 3 and (D) integrin α V β 5 in HPMEC compared to IC. Representative histograms of n = 3 independent experiments are shown. Human primary retinal endothelial cells (RECs) were seeded on immobilized albumin or MFAP4. RECs were stimulated with VEGF and 24-h proliferation was assessed. (E) REC proliferation was co-treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326 (hAS). REC migration for 3.5 h on MFAP4-coated surface was assessed by Transwell assay using VEGF as chemoattractant. (F) MFAP4-dependent migration was treated with integrin α V β 3 - or α V β 5 -blocking antibodies or hAS0326. Data are shown as individual datapoints with mean (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments. Data are normalized to albumin control. Significance is calculated relative to the hAS0326 treatment group for (E) and (F). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Representative images of REC’s (purple) migrated through the pores of the Transwell assay inserts when migration on (G) albumin-coated insert or (H) MFAP4-coated insert. Bar, 100 μm. All antibodies were provided in 10 μg/mL doses for (A), (B), (E), and (F).

    Article Snippet: The cells were allowed to adhere for 3 h. The cells were then treated with hAS0326, anti-integrin α V β 3 (Millipore, cat. # MAB1976), anti-integrin α V β 5 (Santa Cruz, cat. # sc-13588), or IC (HYB099-1, Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) antibody for 1 h before and throughout stimulation with 100 ng/mL VEGF (recombinant human VEGF-A R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Inhibition, Blocking Assay, Labeling, Control, Positive Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Migration, Transwell Assay, Comparison

    Specificity of the AS0326 antibody (A) mAS0326 and (B) hAS0326 efficiently detect MFAP4 in WT ( Mfap4 +/+ ) mouse serum, but not in MFAP4-deficient ( Mfap4 −/− ) mouse serum. (C) Increasing concentrations of hAS0326-Fab or hAS0326Y94A L-CDR3 Fab variant were applied for inhibition of 1.5 nM MFAP4 binding to an excess of immobilized integrin α V β 3 . (D–F) Brown symbols, HG-HYB7-5; purple symbols, mAS0326; red symbols; hAS0326. (D) Both mAS0326 and hAS0326 efficiently detect immobilized recombinant human MFAP4 (rhMFAP4 coating) variant carrying RGD-AAA mutation (RGD-AAA), while HG-HYB7-5 antibody show RGD-dependent binding. Both mAS0326 and hAS0326 efficiently detect immobilized (E) recombinant mouse (rm) MFAP4, and (F) rhMFAP4, while HG-HYB7-5 is rhMFAP4 specific. Data are shown as means (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy

    Article Title: Pharmacological blocking of microfibrillar-associated protein 4 reduces retinal neoangiogenesis and vascular leakage

    doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.038

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Specificity of the AS0326 antibody (A) mAS0326 and (B) hAS0326 efficiently detect MFAP4 in WT ( Mfap4 +/+ ) mouse serum, but not in MFAP4-deficient ( Mfap4 −/− ) mouse serum. (C) Increasing concentrations of hAS0326-Fab or hAS0326Y94A L-CDR3 Fab variant were applied for inhibition of 1.5 nM MFAP4 binding to an excess of immobilized integrin α V β 3 . (D–F) Brown symbols, HG-HYB7-5; purple symbols, mAS0326; red symbols; hAS0326. (D) Both mAS0326 and hAS0326 efficiently detect immobilized recombinant human MFAP4 (rhMFAP4 coating) variant carrying RGD-AAA mutation (RGD-AAA), while HG-HYB7-5 antibody show RGD-dependent binding. Both mAS0326 and hAS0326 efficiently detect immobilized (E) recombinant mouse (rm) MFAP4, and (F) rhMFAP4, while HG-HYB7-5 is rhMFAP4 specific. Data are shown as means (SD) of n = 3 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: The cells were allowed to adhere for 3 h. The cells were then treated with hAS0326, anti-integrin α V β 3 (Millipore, cat. # MAB1976), anti-integrin α V β 5 (Santa Cruz, cat. # sc-13588), or IC (HYB099-1, Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) antibody for 1 h before and throughout stimulation with 100 ng/mL VEGF (recombinant human VEGF-A R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Variant Assay, Inhibition, Binding Assay, Recombinant, Mutagenesis

    Structural basis for the hAS0326 Fab interaction with MFAP4 The hAS0326 Fab complex and the MFAP4 octamer. (A) Cartoon representation of the octameric MFAP4-Fab complex. (B) Each Fab contacts a single MFAP4 monomer at an epitope next to the MFAP4 N terminus but far from the binding site for the Ca 2+ ion (cyan sphere). (C) The MFAP4 octamer is built from two FIBCD1-like tetramers (colored orange and red) with eight Ca 2+ ions located at the tetramer-tetramer interface. (D) Inside view showing the concave face of the tetramer. (E) Top view of the convex face of the tetramer with the four bound Fab molecules. Orange spheres mark the first MFAP4 residue that can be located. Presumably, the disordered RGD integrin-binding motif at the N terminus of MFAP4 is trapped and inaccessible inside the funnel-shaped space formed by the Fab molecules. Nt, N terminus. (F) The epitope mapped on MFAP4. Residues primarily in contact with heavy-chain and light-chain CDRs are colored blue and green, respectively. (G) Details of the intermolecular interaction centered on MFAP4 residues 24–29. Putative polar interactions are indicated by dotted lines.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy

    Article Title: Pharmacological blocking of microfibrillar-associated protein 4 reduces retinal neoangiogenesis and vascular leakage

    doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.038

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Structural basis for the hAS0326 Fab interaction with MFAP4 The hAS0326 Fab complex and the MFAP4 octamer. (A) Cartoon representation of the octameric MFAP4-Fab complex. (B) Each Fab contacts a single MFAP4 monomer at an epitope next to the MFAP4 N terminus but far from the binding site for the Ca 2+ ion (cyan sphere). (C) The MFAP4 octamer is built from two FIBCD1-like tetramers (colored orange and red) with eight Ca 2+ ions located at the tetramer-tetramer interface. (D) Inside view showing the concave face of the tetramer. (E) Top view of the convex face of the tetramer with the four bound Fab molecules. Orange spheres mark the first MFAP4 residue that can be located. Presumably, the disordered RGD integrin-binding motif at the N terminus of MFAP4 is trapped and inaccessible inside the funnel-shaped space formed by the Fab molecules. Nt, N terminus. (F) The epitope mapped on MFAP4. Residues primarily in contact with heavy-chain and light-chain CDRs are colored blue and green, respectively. (G) Details of the intermolecular interaction centered on MFAP4 residues 24–29. Putative polar interactions are indicated by dotted lines.

    Article Snippet: The cells were allowed to adhere for 3 h. The cells were then treated with hAS0326, anti-integrin α V β 3 (Millipore, cat. # MAB1976), anti-integrin α V β 5 (Santa Cruz, cat. # sc-13588), or IC (HYB099-1, Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) antibody for 1 h before and throughout stimulation with 100 ng/mL VEGF (recombinant human VEGF-A R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Residue

    hAS0326 inhibits retinal vascular leakage in laser-induced mouse CNV and STZ-induced rat retinopathy (A) i.v.t. hAS0326 injection was performed on day 0 and 7 after laser burn in a 14-day mouse laser-induced CNV model. Representative (B) FFA and (C) IB4-stained images on laser-induced lesions from the different treatment groups. (D) Quantification of lesion size by FFA or (E) vascular volume (IB4-positive volume). Each data point represents a mean of 1–4 lesions per eye, n = 4–13 animals/group. (F) Type 1 diabetes was induced in Norway brown rats following a dose of STZ (50 mg/kg) and animals were maintained for 21 days. i.v.t. hAS0326 injection was performed on day 0 and 7. (G) FFA was used to calculate the vascular permeability coefficient in a 21-day time course after induction of diabetes. (H) The vascular permeability coefficient day 21. n = 7–8 animals/group (one eye per animal). Individual data points are shown with mean (SD) for all animal experiments. Significance is calculated relative to saline treatment. Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy

    Article Title: Pharmacological blocking of microfibrillar-associated protein 4 reduces retinal neoangiogenesis and vascular leakage

    doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.038

    Figure Lengend Snippet: hAS0326 inhibits retinal vascular leakage in laser-induced mouse CNV and STZ-induced rat retinopathy (A) i.v.t. hAS0326 injection was performed on day 0 and 7 after laser burn in a 14-day mouse laser-induced CNV model. Representative (B) FFA and (C) IB4-stained images on laser-induced lesions from the different treatment groups. (D) Quantification of lesion size by FFA or (E) vascular volume (IB4-positive volume). Each data point represents a mean of 1–4 lesions per eye, n = 4–13 animals/group. (F) Type 1 diabetes was induced in Norway brown rats following a dose of STZ (50 mg/kg) and animals were maintained for 21 days. i.v.t. hAS0326 injection was performed on day 0 and 7. (G) FFA was used to calculate the vascular permeability coefficient in a 21-day time course after induction of diabetes. (H) The vascular permeability coefficient day 21. n = 7–8 animals/group (one eye per animal). Individual data points are shown with mean (SD) for all animal experiments. Significance is calculated relative to saline treatment. Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.

    Article Snippet: The cells were allowed to adhere for 3 h. The cells were then treated with hAS0326, anti-integrin α V β 3 (Millipore, cat. # MAB1976), anti-integrin α V β 5 (Santa Cruz, cat. # sc-13588), or IC (HYB099-1, Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) antibody for 1 h before and throughout stimulation with 100 ng/mL VEGF (recombinant human VEGF-A R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Injection, Staining, Permeability, Saline, Comparison

    i.v.t. hAS0326 reduces DL-AAA-induced retinal vascular leakage area in non-human primates (A) i.v.t. DL-AAA was provided in week 0 in each eye of African green monkeys. Eyes were randomized into treatment groups and 50 μL of vehicle, ranibizumab (positive control, 0.5 mg), or hAS0326 (2 mg) was administered i.v.t. by week 10. FFA imaging was obtained at week 8 post DL-AAA administration (pre-dose) and eight times following i.v.t. treatments (weeks 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22). Fluorescein leakage was assessed by computer-based analysis of 1-min FFA intensity. (B) Vitreous MFAP4 levels are shown as means (SD) from week 0–22. Significance is calculated for the difference in MFAP4 levels at individual time points relative to week 0 in the two treatment groups. Significance was calculated by mixed-effects analysis followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Nd, not detected. (C) Representative FFA images obtained in week 10 (pre-dose), week 12 (maximal positive control efficacy), and week 22 (end of study) are shown for each treatment group. (D–F) Relative FFA-defined leakage areas in percentage of pre-dose area are shown as means (SD) from week 10–22 for vehicle, ranibizumab, and hAS0326 treatment, respectively. Data are normalized to the pre-dose leakage area. Significance is calculated for the difference in leakage from individual time points relative to week 10 in the respective treatment groups. Significance is estimated by mixed-effects analysis followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Relative leakage areas in percentage of pre-dose area (G) week 12 or (H) week 22. Individual data points are shown with mean (SD). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. n = 6–8 eyes/group.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy

    Article Title: Pharmacological blocking of microfibrillar-associated protein 4 reduces retinal neoangiogenesis and vascular leakage

    doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.038

    Figure Lengend Snippet: i.v.t. hAS0326 reduces DL-AAA-induced retinal vascular leakage area in non-human primates (A) i.v.t. DL-AAA was provided in week 0 in each eye of African green monkeys. Eyes were randomized into treatment groups and 50 μL of vehicle, ranibizumab (positive control, 0.5 mg), or hAS0326 (2 mg) was administered i.v.t. by week 10. FFA imaging was obtained at week 8 post DL-AAA administration (pre-dose) and eight times following i.v.t. treatments (weeks 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22). Fluorescein leakage was assessed by computer-based analysis of 1-min FFA intensity. (B) Vitreous MFAP4 levels are shown as means (SD) from week 0–22. Significance is calculated for the difference in MFAP4 levels at individual time points relative to week 0 in the two treatment groups. Significance was calculated by mixed-effects analysis followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Nd, not detected. (C) Representative FFA images obtained in week 10 (pre-dose), week 12 (maximal positive control efficacy), and week 22 (end of study) are shown for each treatment group. (D–F) Relative FFA-defined leakage areas in percentage of pre-dose area are shown as means (SD) from week 10–22 for vehicle, ranibizumab, and hAS0326 treatment, respectively. Data are normalized to the pre-dose leakage area. Significance is calculated for the difference in leakage from individual time points relative to week 10 in the respective treatment groups. Significance is estimated by mixed-effects analysis followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Relative leakage areas in percentage of pre-dose area (G) week 12 or (H) week 22. Individual data points are shown with mean (SD). Significance calculations are performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. n = 6–8 eyes/group.

    Article Snippet: The cells were allowed to adhere for 3 h. The cells were then treated with hAS0326, anti-integrin α V β 3 (Millipore, cat. # MAB1976), anti-integrin α V β 5 (Santa Cruz, cat. # sc-13588), or IC (HYB099-1, Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) antibody for 1 h before and throughout stimulation with 100 ng/mL VEGF (recombinant human VEGF-A R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Positive Control, Imaging, Comparison

    The macular proteome of the DL-AAA-induced model of chronic retinopathy supports integrin involvement Macular punches including choroid, RPE, and retina obtained at end-study (week 22) were analyzed by mass spectrometry and following analysis using clusterProfiler 4.0 package in R. The proteomes were generated from n = 3 eyes for non-diseased control, n = 5 eyes for DL-AAA treatment, and n = 5 eyes for hAS0326 treatment. (A) Over-representation analysis (ORA) showing the effect of DL-AAA treatment (relative to no DL-AAA treatment) and hAS0326 treatment of DL-AAA-treated eyes (relative to DL-AAA treatment), respectively. The plot was generated using compareCluster function with default settings. All ontologies with significant regulation post correction for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure are shown. Dot sizes indicate the ratio (i.e., the coverage of a given term by proteins regulated for each comparison), and dot colors indicate the level of significance. (B–E) Volcano plots showing regulation of detected proteins underlying selected GO terms. For selected, significantly regulated gene ontologies, the ORA input proteins displaying significant regulation are highlighted in color. Protein IDs are shown for the top three proteins with lowest p belonging to a particular ontology. Moreover, protein IDs are shown for specific proteins of interest.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy

    Article Title: Pharmacological blocking of microfibrillar-associated protein 4 reduces retinal neoangiogenesis and vascular leakage

    doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.01.038

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The macular proteome of the DL-AAA-induced model of chronic retinopathy supports integrin involvement Macular punches including choroid, RPE, and retina obtained at end-study (week 22) were analyzed by mass spectrometry and following analysis using clusterProfiler 4.0 package in R. The proteomes were generated from n = 3 eyes for non-diseased control, n = 5 eyes for DL-AAA treatment, and n = 5 eyes for hAS0326 treatment. (A) Over-representation analysis (ORA) showing the effect of DL-AAA treatment (relative to no DL-AAA treatment) and hAS0326 treatment of DL-AAA-treated eyes (relative to DL-AAA treatment), respectively. The plot was generated using compareCluster function with default settings. All ontologies with significant regulation post correction for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure are shown. Dot sizes indicate the ratio (i.e., the coverage of a given term by proteins regulated for each comparison), and dot colors indicate the level of significance. (B–E) Volcano plots showing regulation of detected proteins underlying selected GO terms. For selected, significantly regulated gene ontologies, the ORA input proteins displaying significant regulation are highlighted in color. Protein IDs are shown for the top three proteins with lowest p belonging to a particular ontology. Moreover, protein IDs are shown for specific proteins of interest.

    Article Snippet: The cells were allowed to adhere for 3 h. The cells were then treated with hAS0326, anti-integrin α V β 3 (Millipore, cat. # MAB1976), anti-integrin α V β 5 (Santa Cruz, cat. # sc-13588), or IC (HYB099-1, Staten Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) antibody for 1 h before and throughout stimulation with 100 ng/mL VEGF (recombinant human VEGF-A R&D Systems).

    Techniques: Mass Spectrometry, Generated, Control, Comparison

    In vitro binding of cRGD-MB to HUVEC under flow conditions. A Fluorescence images of non-stimulated (control) or TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and α v β 3 integrins were stained with DAPI (blue), wheat germ agglutinin-488 (WGA, green) and CD51/61 antibody (red), respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Quantitative analysis indicating significantly higher area fraction of α v β 3 integrin in HUVEC stimulated with TNF-α. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C Schematic showing the in vitro setup of the flow chamber. Petri dishes with cultured HUVEC were connected to a flow chamber, in turn perfused with an MB solution (standard-MB, cRAD-MB, or cRGD-MB) at 0.25 mL/min. D Representative fluorescent images of the three different, rhodamine-labeled MB types binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and MB were labeled with DAPI (blue), WGA (green) and rhodamine (red), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm. E Number of bound MB per cell. cRGD-MB displayed significantly higher binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC compared to both controls. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent MB batches. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired t-tests in panel B, while for panel E comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001

    Journal: Journal of Nanobiotechnology

    Article Title: Aminolysis-mediated single-step surface functionalization of poly (butyl cyanoacrylate) microbubbles for ultrasound molecular imaging

    doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02806-9

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro binding of cRGD-MB to HUVEC under flow conditions. A Fluorescence images of non-stimulated (control) or TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and α v β 3 integrins were stained with DAPI (blue), wheat germ agglutinin-488 (WGA, green) and CD51/61 antibody (red), respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. B Quantitative analysis indicating significantly higher area fraction of α v β 3 integrin in HUVEC stimulated with TNF-α. Data are represented as mean ± SD. C Schematic showing the in vitro setup of the flow chamber. Petri dishes with cultured HUVEC were connected to a flow chamber, in turn perfused with an MB solution (standard-MB, cRAD-MB, or cRGD-MB) at 0.25 mL/min. D Representative fluorescent images of the three different, rhodamine-labeled MB types binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC. The nuclei, cell membrane and MB were labeled with DAPI (blue), WGA (green) and rhodamine (red), respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm. E Number of bound MB per cell. cRGD-MB displayed significantly higher binding to TNF-α stimulated HUVEC compared to both controls. Data represent mean ± SD of three independent MB batches. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired t-tests in panel B, while for panel E comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001

    Article Snippet: The tumor sections were fixed with 80% methanol for 5 min at 4 °C followed by the addition of acetone at − 20 °C for 2 min. After fixation, sections were washed 3 times with PBS and incubated overnight with a rabbit anti-α v β 3 integrin antibody (1 μg/ μL; eBioscience, San Diego, California, USA) at a dilution of 1:100 at 4 °C.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Binding Assay, Fluorescence, Control, Membrane, Staining, Cell Culture, Labeling

    Adenovirus binding affinity to MPNST cell lines and viral receptor expression (A) Schematic of viral genome for Ad vectors used in binding assay. (B) Each cell line was infected with Ad vectors equipped with either WT (Ad5), RGD fiber-modified (RGD), or chimeric Ad5/Ad3 fiber (Ad5/3) at 100 VP/cell. Binding was allowed to proceed for 2 h at 4°C, then was assessed by qPCR. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of CAR and integrin expression. MPNST cell lines were incubated with fluorescent antibodies against α V β 3 and α V β 5 integrins and coxsackie adenovirus receptor (CAR). The data are shown as a relative percentage of positive cells scored among at least 10,000 cells assessed. (D) Flow cytometry plots by cell line with respective isotype control for viral entry receptors in MPNST cell lines and iHSC1 λ controls. Error bars represents ± standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Student's t test.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology

    Article Title: Conditionally replicative adenovirus as a therapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors

    doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200783

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Adenovirus binding affinity to MPNST cell lines and viral receptor expression (A) Schematic of viral genome for Ad vectors used in binding assay. (B) Each cell line was infected with Ad vectors equipped with either WT (Ad5), RGD fiber-modified (RGD), or chimeric Ad5/Ad3 fiber (Ad5/3) at 100 VP/cell. Binding was allowed to proceed for 2 h at 4°C, then was assessed by qPCR. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of CAR and integrin expression. MPNST cell lines were incubated with fluorescent antibodies against α V β 3 and α V β 5 integrins and coxsackie adenovirus receptor (CAR). The data are shown as a relative percentage of positive cells scored among at least 10,000 cells assessed. (D) Flow cytometry plots by cell line with respective isotype control for viral entry receptors in MPNST cell lines and iHSC1 λ controls. Error bars represents ± standard deviation. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Student's t test.

    Article Snippet: Cells were plated and cultured for 24 h, non-enzymatically lifted off the plate (Sigma C5789), washed with PBS, and stained with antibodies for integrins α ν β 3 (BS-1310R-Cy3, Bioss) or immunoglobulin (Ig)G isotype control (BS-025P); α ν β 5 (565836-AF647, BD) or κ isotype control (565378-AF647, BD); and CAR (BS-2389R-A488, Bioss) or IgG Isotype control (BS-0295P-A488).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Expressing, Infection, Modification, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Control, Standard Deviation